- 13 Sections
- 71 Lessons
- 10 Weeks
- Mobile-Forensics Mission, Authority and Quality
Outcome: Define the mobile-forensics mission, authority, ethics, laboratory controls and defensible professional workflow.
Case: Project Anveshak begins when a fictional Indian logistics company reports possible invoice fraud and customer-list exfiltration. Written authority covers a company Android phone, a consented encrypted iPhone backup and supplied cloud exports; the live personal iPhone remains outside scope.
Tools: Authority and scope memo, Mobile evidence map, Lab safety checklist
7- 1.1Mobile forensics is a controlled forensic process
- 1.2Authority controls every action
- 1.3Use the professional workflow
- 1.4Build a safe, isolated laboratory
- 1.5Separate observation, inference and conclusion
- 1.6Start Project Anveshak defensibly
- 1.7Module 1 Assessment – Mobile-Forensics Mission, Authority and Quality5 Minutes5 Questions
- Mobile Ecosystems and Evidence Architecture
Outcome: Explain Android and Apple mobile architectures and predict how hardware, operating-system, application and cloud controls affect evidence availability.
Case: The two Project Anveshak sources differ: a managed Android handset is powered on and unlocked, while an encrypted iPhone backup was supplied with its backup password and a documented export process.
Tools: Architecture comparison, Evidence-source map, State-and-key worksheet
7- 2.1Model the mobile evidence stack
- 2.2Understand Android isolation and storage
- 2.3Understand Android encryption states
- 2.4Understand Apple security architecture
- 2.5Account for synchronisation and cloud copies
- 2.6Treat architecture claims as versioned
- 2.7Module 2 Assessment – Mobile Ecosystems and Evidence Architecture5 Minutes5 Questions
- Scene Handling, Seizure, Isolation and Preservation
Outcome: Document, stabilise, isolate, package and transport mobile devices while preserving state, integrity, safety and other forensic opportunities.
Case: Investigators encounter the company Android on a desk, powered on and unlocked, connected to Wi-Fi and paired with a smartwatch. The acquisition laboratory is ninety minutes away.
Tools: Scene record, Isolation decision log, Packaging and transport form
7- 3.1Document before intervention
- 3.2Decide whether to maintain power
- 3.3Isolate communications carefully
- 3.4Protect other forensic opportunities
- 3.5Package, transport and maintain custody
- 3.6Escalate volatile and exceptional conditions
- 3.7Module 3 Assessment – Scene Handling, Seizure, Isolation and Preservation5 Minutes5 Questions
- Acquisition Strategy and Defensible Collection
Outcome: Select and justify a proportionate acquisition strategy for a specific device state, scope, risk, tool capability and validation requirement.
Case: The Project Anveshak team must choose between a management export, logical backup, file-system acquisition, targeted app export and manual capture while the Android remains unlocked.
Tools: Acquisition decision matrix, Tool capability record, Hash and validation log
7- 4.1Define the collection objective
- 4.2Compare acquisition categories
- 4.3Use least-impact, highest-value sequencing
- 4.4Record tool, cable and configuration context
- 4.5Validate acquisition results
- 4.6Document unavailable or deferred methods
- 4.7Module 4 Assessment – Acquisition Strategy and Defensible Collection5 Minutes5 Questions
- Android Forensics
Outcome: Interpret common Android acquisitions, storage structures, system records and application artifacts without overstating completeness or attribution.
Case: The company Android acquisition contains device and credential-encrypted areas, work-profile data, shared media and several app databases. The tool parses only part of the work-profile content.
Tools: Android artifact map, Package and profile worksheet, Validation notebook
7 - iOS and iPadOS Forensics
Outcome: Interpret common iPhone and iPad acquisitions, backups, plists, databases, logs and Data Protection constraints without overstating access.
Case: The supplied encrypted iPhone backup contains app domains, device information, messages and media indexes, but it does not include every file that would exist in a full file-system acquisition.
Tools: Backup provenance record, Domain and plist map, Apple limitation statement
7- 6.1Identify Apple device and backup context
- 6.2Understand Data Protection implications
- 6.3Navigate backup domains and manifests
- 6.4Interpret plists, databases and unified records
- 6.5Handle iCloud and linked sources lawfully
- 6.6State iOS limitations precisely
- 6.7Module 6 Assessment – iOS and iPadOS Forensics5 Minutes5 Questions
- SIM, eSIM, Removable Media and Telecom Evidence
Outcome: Examine SIM, eSIM, removable-media and telecommunications records while separating device, subscriber, account, network and user identity.
Case: Project Anveshak includes a physical SIM, an eSIM profile reference, call-detail records supplied by counsel and an Android microSD card labelled portable storage.
Tools: Identity matrix, SIM and media examination plan, Telecom correlation table
7 - Applications, Communications, Web and Cloud Artifacts
Outcome: Recover and correlate communications, browser, social, cloud and application evidence within lawful scope and with privacy minimisation.
Case: The case contains a synthetic chat database, browser history, cloud-drive audit export, email container and social-media cache, all collected under separate documented authorities.
Tools: App triage matrix, Communication thread reconstruction, Cloud provenance log
7- 8.1Triage applications by investigative question
- 8.2Reconstruct message context
- 8.3Analyse email and browser evidence
- 8.4Examine social and ephemeral apps
- 8.5Use cloud exports with provenance
- 8.6Minimise sensitive and privileged content
- 8.7Module 8 Assessment – Applications, Communications, Web and Cloud Artifacts5 Minutes5 Questions
- Artifact Validation, Media, Location and Timeline Analysis
Outcome: Validate SQLite, plist, log, media, location and time artifacts and construct a timezone-aware, source-linked event timeline.
Case: Project Anveshak contains SQLite databases with WAL files, binary plists, EXIF media, GNSS-related records and timestamps expressed in Unix, Apple and local formats.
Tools: Source-validation worksheet, Time-normalisation table, Event timeline
7 - Deleted, Hidden, Encrypted and Anti-Forensic Conditions
Outcome: Assess deleted, hidden, encrypted and anti-forensic conditions using safe validation, documented limitations and specialist escalation.
Case: The synthetic datasets contain deleted SQLite rows, orphaned attachments, an encrypted app container, renamed files, disabled logging and a gap caused by retention rather than deliberate deletion.
Tools: Condition assessment, Recovery-validation log, Specialist escalation note
7- 10.1Define deletion precisely
- 10.2Validate recovered records
- 10.3Recognise encryption boundaries
- 10.4Assess concealment and anti-forensics
- 10.5Handle damaged or unsupported devices
- 10.6Write useful negative findings
- 10.7Module 10 Assessment – Deleted, Hidden, Encrypted and Anti-Forensic Conditions5 Minutes5 Questions
- Correlation, Interpretation, Reporting and Testimony
Outcome: Correlate mobile evidence, test competing explanations, document provenance and produce a clear, reproducible examination report.
Case: The Project Anveshak findings include a device login, a cloud upload, a matching file hash, a payment message and competing explanations involving automation and shared-device access.
Tools: Hypothesis matrix, Examination report, Peer-review checklist
7- 11.1Move from artifacts to tested propositions
- 11.2Correlate across sources
- 11.3Write a reproducible report
- 11.4Use calibrated conclusions
- 11.5Perform technical and administrative review
- 11.6Prepare for testimony and challenge
- 11.7Module 11 Assessment – Correlation, Interpretation, Reporting and Testimony5 Minutes5 Questions
- Capstone - Project Anveshak
Outcome: Defend an end-to-end mobile-forensics plan and findings package for Project Anveshak under professional, legal, quality and ethical constraints.
Case: The final case pack combines the authorised Android acquisition, consented encrypted iPhone backup, SIM report, cloud export, provider records, business logs, conflicting timestamps and an unsupported-app database. Learners must decide what can be concluded and what requires escalation.
Tools: End-to-end examination plan, Findings and limitations report, Executive and technical briefing
6- 12.1Confirm authority, questions and evidence
- 12.2Design the acquisition and validation plan
- 12.3Examine Android and Apple evidence
- 12.4Correlate communications, cloud, telecom and business records
- 12.5Report findings and limitations
- 12.6Module 12 Assessment – Capstone – Project Anveshak5 Minutes5 Questions
- Final Examination - Mobile ForensicsFinal assessment for Mobile Forensics. Passing score: 70%.1
